Writing-to-Learn
Adventure #2:
The
Worldview Layer of the Mind
The Key to Surviving, Thriving, and Living the Good Life
(Coming Soon! Also Completely FREE When It's Ready)
|
Reserved
for Links
to
User Comments:
Home Schooling
College Writing Courses
High School Writing Courses
Reserved
for Links to: Participating/
Recommended Writing Programs
|
|
The
Craving for Stories
is the Craving for Life Itself
...
One of the first things that we yearn for as children is to
hear a story.
The
main thing that drives us to learn to read in the beginning
is the knowledge that when we do master that skill we will
finally be able to "hear" stories for ourselves,
and the first real books we read are story books.
This
craving for a good story stays with us as long as we live.
We never outgrow it.
Indeed,
it seems to me to be a psychological fact (although I have
never seen it in print any where else) that we are largely
driven by a compulsion to make each part of our lives turn
out to be a deeply satisfying story. Trying to get our lives
"right" in a way that satisfies our in-built story
sense is what keeps us going.
The
thing that keeps us from seeing deeply enough into ourselves
to be directly aware of how our story sense drives us in life
is probably the fact that we seldom pursue just one story
straight through to the end. Life forces us to take a lot
of things into account all at once, and each problem that
we have to deal with is potentially a separate story. What's
more, as a practical matter, pursuing one story sometimes
implies other stories that we have to pursue first or along
the way.
And so in the end, our lives become a tapestry of interwoven
adventures, because pursuing an adventure is what we
call the process of turning some part of our lives into a
pattern of events that makes a good, satisfying story.
Pursuing
adventures, then, is the way that we try to turn our lives
into a tapestry of stories, and Writing-to-Learn
Adventure #1:
(The Organizing
Adventure of Life)
is designed to teach you the art of sorting out the separate
strands that make up the tapestry of lives. When you learn
to see your own life and the lives of others in these terms
and find the organizing patterns, you begin to see yourself
and other people and your relationships to them clearly.
You
begin, probably for the first time, to get a real handle on
some of the most important practical matters in your life.
|
A
Special Effect of
Writing-to-Learn
Adventure #1
The easiest way to acquire the practical inner skills to be
learned from Writing-to-Learn
Adventure #1:
(The Organizing
Adventure of Life)
is
to apply the concepts to fictional characters. The concepts
work to clarify the workings of people in real life. But real
life is messy, and our knowledge of other people is always
incomplete.
In
the characters that writers create, however, even in works
presented as biographies (or autobiographies), things are
always much more simple. We have fewer details to work with;
the details have been carefully selected for us; and part
of the art of writing in the first place is to simplify just
enough to make character understandable while still making
the character realistic.
The
result is that it is easier in written works to figure out
what the organizing adventure of each character's life is.
It is easier not only because we have only limited, selected
details organized into a pattern for us to work with. It is
also easier because authors tend to think of the characters
they invent as having an organizing adventure for their lives
(even though I am unaware of any writers who actually say
that they work this way).
Still,
the case examples from fiction and biography in The
Organizing Adventure of Lifeare
very straightforward, compelling, and downright useful in
learning how to think of life as a tapestry of adventures
with an organizing adventure as its theme. The way of thinking
that these cases illustrate grows very naturally out of the
works themselves.
The
bottom line here is this:
The
way of thinking to be studied in The
Organizing Adventure of Life
is
so useful in practical living and the use of fictional
cases is such a natural way to learn the basic concepts
that this one Writing-to-Learn
Adventure could change the way that we "do"
education in our society.
It
could also greatly elevate the social value that we
assign to the teaching and study of literature in general.
|
At
the very least, it will be interesting to see how close to
right this view of the special effect of The
Organizing Adventure of Life
turns out to be.
Suggestion:
Bookmark this page now.
|
The Point Is ...
You
can actually develop new insights that can greatly improve
the quality of your life, just by reading and writing
about the right things and then revising and revising
your work until you know you've got it right. |
For
example, with just a little shove in a new direction, you
can easily learn how to understand other people better than
you ever have before. And at the same time, you can learn
how you can have a great love life, if you're willing and
able to do the work.
All
of this by just writing, with a little help.
That's
what you get in the Writing-to-Learn
Adventure #1.
And all it costs you is the time it takes you to do the
work.
You
get the materials to do the Writing-to-Learn
Adventures
absolutely free.
(Yes,
this is a "dot com," and I do make money here
but not in any way that dilutes the quality of
what you get for free here.)
|
What
you will be doing specifically in Writing-to-Learn
Adventure #1
is applying a new conceptual framework in writing about your
own life and behavior, about other people, and especially
about fictional characters.
This
new way of thinking turned up as part of a larger research
project of mine, and it actually does a lot more than I've
mentioned so far. So,
just for the record, here's a longer list of benefits (along
with information about the work for you to do):
How
Can Writing-to-Learn
Adventure #1
improve the Quality of Your
Life?
1.
You will understand yourself and other people in a new,
more intuitive way.
2.
You will learn a conceptual framework that will help you
see clearly what the organizing adventure of your own life
is and put together the best love life for yourself that
you can have.
3.
It will change what you think of as the basics of education
and introduce you to new possibilities of self-education.
4.
It will teach you to use many things that you already know
in a new way to get more out of life. In particular, it
will transform the way you think about reading a novel or
watching a movie.
5.
Like all Writing-to-Learn
Adventures,
it will take your understanding of the writing-to-learn
process to a higher level.
6.
And there is a special bonus for anyone who plans to
write novels, short stories, plays, or biographies:
The new way of understanding people that you will learn
about here will give an enormous boost to your ability to
create characters for the stories you tell.
Your
Work in
Writing-to-Learn Adventure #1:
Every
Writing-To-Learn Adventure comes in two parts: (1) The reading
part and (2) the writing part. You simply read the material
that is given to you at this Web site. Then you write about
it to learn it. Samples of how you might write
about it are included as part of the reading material. The
object in doing the writing is to internalize the concepts
in the reading material and make them a part of the way
that you think. As I am sure you already know, learning
is a lot more than mere memorization.
As
you read Writing-to-Learn
Adventure #1 (The
Organizing Adventure of Life),
pay special attention to the cases used to explain the concepts.
They are included in the write up on this Web site and in
the free PDF ebook version of the material available at
Lulu.
You will find four sample case write-ups from the ebook
later on this page, if you want to see some examples now.
Writing up similar cases for yourself, using the things
you have read, the movies you have seen, and your experiences
with other people or absolutely anything else
is the writing part of Writing-to-Learn
Adventure #1.
The
end product of your own writing is a kind of analytical
painting a conceptual picture that is
a work of art of someone (a real person,
a fictional character, or yourself). It may be as
short as a paragraph or as long as a novel. Or even
longer.
The
length depends strictly on how far you want to develop
your understanding.
As
you can tell from the sample case materials below*
(especially the last two), you could even use the
process to write a novel, a biography, or a short
story.
*Just
below the Start Box for The
Organizing Adventure of Life
|
You
will seldom get a case worked out to your own long-term
satisfaction the first time. You will have to come back
and rethink it and rewrite it any number of times until
you satisfy your own standards. Of course, the more you
use the material in your writing, the better you will use
it in understanding yourself and other people.
It's
time now to deliver the benefits after just one last
point:
Your
mind grows by thinking, and learning to write as a matter
of habit is a practical part of learning to think.
|
|
This
Is the Start Box
for Writing-to-Learn Adventure #1:
The
Organizing Adventure of Life
Understand
Yourself and Other People and Make Your Love Life Work
This
is probably the most dangerous misconception that you have
picked up in life:
We're
all pretty much alike. We all have the same basic needs
and want the same things out of life.
|
This
statement is dangerous because it is about half true. It
is in fact a popular, slightly dramatic way of saying that
we are all members of the same human family. And that much
is true, of course.
But
if you accept this statement as anywhere near the whole
truth, you are ruling out basic insights that can dramatically
improve the quality of your life.
Indeed,
most people are profoundly different
from you, and failing to sort out these differences
can cause you many problems and a great deal of pain
and suffering.
|
What
you will find in Writing-to-Learn
Adventure #1
is a new conceptual framework to help you understand yourself
and other people and your relationships with them. Once
you learn to see your life and your relationships clearly,
you can do a better job of getting your life on track and
keeping it there and you can do a better job of choosing
the relationships that you want to nourish and of figuring
out how to do it.
For
example, within this new framework, you will learn how
to get the best love life that you can have. ...
Click
here
to read the rest on line.
Or click here
download a free 37-page PDF
of The
Organizing Adventure of Life
to print out or to read off line.
|
Sample
Case Materials: Applying the Concepts of The Organizing
Adventure of Life:
Mr.
Darcy and Elizabeth Bennett, etc. in Pride and Prejudice
I
am a Jane Austen fan. For decades, I read her novels
all of them a couple of times a year
or more. But her six novels have been turned into
such excellent visual productions that I watch DVDs
now instead of reading.
The
DVD version of Pride and Prejudice
from A&E/BBC is my favorite (although the lack
of closed captioning is a real flaw).
You
will learn a lot at this Web site about egocentricity
because you have to thoroughly understand the
concept in order to sort out other people and
the organizing adventures of their lives.
That
is the reason for the emphasis on Jane Austen
here. She was the world's greatest authority
on the subject. She explored and delineated
the widest variety of egocentric behavior in
the characters that she created.
Most of the problems that her heroines have
to deal with originate in someone else's egocentric
behavior. She
knew the subject from A to Z, and reading her
novels a number of times is probably the best
and easiest way to get an education on the subject.
You
do, of course, learn things better when you
learn them the hard way. But hard experience
is a hard teacher.
|
One
of the most useful things about Jane Austen is that
she makes the driving, habitual mindset of her characters
absolutely clear in terms of the way it affects their
behavior and she also frequently gives us the
rationalizations that they use to conceal their motives
from themselves. This clarity about the motivating
drives of behavior and the masks of rationalization
is important here because it is the thing that makes
it so easy to understand so many of her characters
in terms of the organizing adventure of their lives.
Applying
the organizing adventure concept to Mr. Darcy, for
example, is very straightforward. In the first part
of Pride and Prejudice, he organizes
his life in terms of the social status adventure.
He considers personal relationships, especially in
the matter of marriage, strictly in terms of social
repercussions, family social position and reputation,
and the potential for one to to enhance, or at least
publicly confirm, one's social position.
With this point of view firmly fixed as his automatic
frame of reference, he simply can't wrap his mind
around the possibility that anyone would choose to
marry into a family with the obvious social and economic
handicaps of the Bennetts not to mention the
fact that marriage to any of the Bennett women would
involve becoming related to the mother of the family,
who seems to have a complete void where one expects
to find the social and personal graces.
Such considerations as how intelligent, attractive,
socially accomplished, and downright decent Jane and
Elizabeth might be are completely irrelevant to Mr.
Darcy in the first part of the work. Indeed, he is
astounded and dismayed, right through his first marriage
proposal to Elizabeth, to find that he is irresistibly
attracted to her. His own actions disturb him.
What
he discovers is that Elizabeth isn't going to have
anything to do with anyone as shallow and insensitive
to the needs of other people as he has become. It
is, of course, the organizing adventure that Mr. Darcy
has chosen to guide him through life that has made
him as shallow and insensitive as he is.
We
see very little of the process of his transformation
from one organizing adventure to another, but the
final result is dramatic. Over a period of some months,
he does manage to change himself. He makes the
love adventure the organizing adventure of his
life and comes to terms with what that means in the
way of new attitudes and habitual patterns of behavior.
Why
does he do it?
It
almost certainly isn't just the fact that he can't
get Elizabeth to marry him in the sorry inner state
that he has fallen into. The source of his transformation
is most likely the concatenation of that fact with
other facts: The fact that Elizabeth so firmly and
positively rejects him, the fact that she so clearly
does not regard him as a decent sort of person and
can give him her reasons in such unsettling detail
(misguided as she is in some parts), the fact that
he is profoundly unattracted to women (like the sisters
of his friend Mr. Bingley) whose perceptions are governed
by the same organizing adventure that he has adopted,
and the fact that his organizing adventure has led
him to stoop so such miserable behavior as actually
concealing matters from his friend Mr. Bingley (specifically,
the information that Elizabeth's sister Jane was in
London all winter, where Mr. Bingley was, too.)
Sorting
through all of these things, Mr. Darcy seems to have
asked himself, "What the hell have I been doing?"
And he seems to come to the conclusion that he just
doesn't want to be the kind of person he is. What
he discovers that he wants most out of life is a woman
to love whom he can respect and admire for her intelligence,
taste, and general good sense, instead of for the
superficial qualities that he has fallen into the
habit of focusing upon.
He discovers upon reflection that he has found in
Elizabeth Bennett exactly the woman who suits him
and changes the organizing adventure of his life to
a love adventure which in turn changes
his attitudes and values and behavior and the choices
that he makes.
As
his new character unfolds, Elizabeth Bennett is in
a position to witness the fruits of his transformation
and to benefit from them. Her opinion of him changes
dramatically, he offers again to marry her, and she
accepts his second proposal.
Elizabeth
Bennett has chosen love as the organizing adventure
of her life long before the story opens. She tells
her sister that she will only marry for love, and
she makes the point absolutely clear in her refusals,
first of Mr. Collins and then of Mr. Darcy. In contrast,
her friend Charlotte Lucas (who married Mr. Collins)
is willing to marry strictly for social position and
economic security, which is obviously the organizing
adventure of her life.
Elizabeth also makes it clear in her first attitude
towards Mr. Wickham that she is not insensitive to
economic necessities. As attracted to Mr. Wickham
as she is in the early part of the work, she has no
interest in marrying him, purely as a practical economic
matter. Unlike her youngest sister (who does marry
Mr. Wickham), she is aware that a happy marriage requires
a certain minimum of economic resources to support
it. Without that prospect, she is unwilling even to
think about marriage.
She
pursues the ideal of her love adventure consistently
throughout the novel and winds up with what she wants,
once she unwittingly drives Mr. Darcy to adopt the
love adventure as the organizing adventure
of his life, too, and become the sort of person she
can love.
Mrs. Bennett is a more interesting case than she may
seem to be on the surface. She is, I admit, an obnoxious,
overbearing, irritating, tasteless, stupid person. The
organizing adventure in her life, as she appears in
the novel, is raising her daughters and getting them
married, and like most stupid people, all of her efforts
are counterproductive. Having her on your side is just
about equivalent to having two people of average intelligence
who are out to do you harm.
There
are two basic distinctions that apply to all of
the adventures in life:
(1) Whether they are carried out intelligently
or unintelligently and
(2)
Whether they have a purely egocentric focus or
are at least tempered by some real concern for
the welfare of others.
|
Mrs. Bennett is not only just about as unintelligent
as people who can still function in society get to be.
She is also almost purely egocentric. In her own view,
of course, she isn't that way. She is working as best
she can to help her daughters do well in life. But as
you would expect of an egocentric, she is totally incapable
of understanding that her version of what her daughters
need to do well in life may not be what they
want (as her behavior when Elizabeth rejects Mr. Collins'
proposal clearly shows). And matters go just about the
way you would expect them to go for a pure egocentric
who is on the stupid side of the dividing line in humanity:
Her efforts to help her daughters do them more harm
than good.
In
her egocentric behavior, she is very much like the early
Mr. Darcy, who knows what is best for his friend Bingley
and manipulates Mr. Bingley's life accordingly. The
difference is that the early Mr. Darcy is an intelligent
egocentric. But his own organizing adventure at that
stage (the social status adventure) points him exactly
in the wrong direction to be of any real benefit to
his friend. All he manages to do is to make his friend
miserable.
As
for Mrs. Bennett, the thing that makes her case more
interesting than it might be at first glance for most
people is the fact that her concern for her daughters'
welfare has a solid basis. She and her daughters do
face the prospect of being penniless in life, if Mr.
Bennett dies before the daughters are married. In the
early nineteenth century, medicine was much more primitive
than it is today; life spans were very short by modern
standards; and there was an almost total lack of meaningful
economic opportunities for women.
In
short, living under the kind of pressure that Mrs. Bennett
must have felt could undermine the mental functioning
of almost any woman, without having five daughters to
provide for.
To
be sure, the woman is repugnant. I would hate to be
related to her (although I actually was related to a
very similar woman with none of Mrs. Bennett's real
excuses a woman whose demise, incidentally, was
welcomed by all concerned). But I still feel more than
a touch of sympathy for Mrs. Bennett because of the
real threat of disaster that was a daily part of her
life.
Phil
Conners (Bill Murray) in Groundhog Day
If
you are a Pride and Prejudice fan,
Phil Conners in Groundhog Day is "déjà
vu all over again" a modern, strictly
comic version of Mr. Darcy. And in general terms, the plot
is much the same, too: Grossly egocentric man finds great
woman attractive, suffers absolute rejection, can't get
along without her, and can't win her affections until he
transforms himself into a decent human being who is sensitive
to the needs of others.
As
in Pride and Prejudice, it turns out
that no woman with any taste and sense will be attracted
to such a man. But there is a new twist: The comic fantasy
that the universe is built in such way that egocentric behavior
beyond a certain point is absolutely unacceptable.
And
Phil Conners goes beyond that point.
He exceeds the patience of the universe and invokes "the
ultimate sanction:" The machinery of the universe refuses
to move on and refuses to let him move on. It traps him
in time and place, making him repeat the same day of his
life over and over and over again until he transforms himself
to meet (what ought to be) the minimal requirements of human
conduct. He can't even get out of the bind that the universe
has put him in by committing suicide. No matter what he
does short of a complete remake of his personality, it's
Groundhog Day all over again for him in Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania,
when he wakes up in the morning.
It
is a comic idea with a great deal of charm.
The
early Phil Conners and the early Mr. Darcy are psychological
twins, as are their transformed versions. Their original
organizing adventures, however, are not quite the same,
although they are closely related.
The
early Mr. Darcy organizes his life around the social status
adventure. That adventure is just a specific form of the
ego trip adventure. It is based on a common, standard system
for rationalizing and expressing an egocentric focus in
life.
But
in Groundhog Day, part of the comedy is the
fact that Phil Conners is such a clod in the beginning that
he doesn't need the crutch of any specific set of rationalizations.
He organizes his life as a pure, unadulterated ego trip
without regret, without apology, without any sense that
he might even be imposing on other people, much less trying
the patience of the universe itself. He just automatically
goes through life using everyone he meets or works with
as raw food to feed his sense of self-importance and superiority.
All
of which brings us to an interesting point:
There
are many seductive forms of rationalization that the
ego trip adventure can take.
|
One
can, for example, be easily seduced by the pursuit of social
superiority, if one happens to have the social position
and social access to make the mask plausible, as was the
case with Mr. Darcy. Or one can be seduced by the ruthless
pursuit of money, as has been the case with many corporate
criminals of recent times; or by the ruthless pursuit of
political power, as was the case with Hitler, George Wallace,
and Orval Faubus (to mention just the examples that come
most readily to mind for someone my age); or by the ruthless
pursuit of religious beliefs or of any ideology, as is the
case with all terrorists, domestic and foreign.
All
of these adventures and many others are designed for no
higher purpose than ego feeding.
But some people, like Phil Conners, don't need a specific
form. They simply go through life feeding their egos on
every target of opportunity, usually but not exclusively
by belittling and insulting other people or by simple character
assassination. After your first personal exposure, you can't
miss the type. The implicit message in their behavior is
that "I am superior because everyone
else is inferior. The universe exists for my personal benefit,
and it is outrageous for other people to claim equal right
to the kind of attention that I deserve."
That
is the message they construct their lives to reinforce in
their own minds, the message that they feed on and intend
for other people to swallow, too. This is the way that they
develop a sense of self-worth.
In
real life, such people are not comic characters.
They
are extremely destructive, and sooner or later, you are
virtually certain to meet one or more of them. Phil Conners
is the embodiment of such a person.
The
treatment in Groundhog Day is comic, but the
message is profound.
Ben
Franklin
When
it comes to historical figures, opinions about their
organizing adventures may depend on the biographical
materials you consider.
In
putting together this brief case on Ben Franklin's
organizing adventure, I have limited myself to these
short selections from the Web:
Ben
Franklin and his wife, Deborah, were a very enterprising
pair. Their union was a common-law affair, never
recorded in any church records, but they owned and
ran a newspaper, a publishing business, a store,
and a book shop. Ben also wrote a lot.
He
put together many companies and organizations to
meet public needs, and many of them exist today
(the American Philosophical Society, the Pennsylvania
Hospital, a public library, and an insurance company,
etc.).
He
was an inventor and did scientific research in electricity
and meteorology. (He invented the Franklin Stove,
the lightening rod, and the first postmasters' rate
chart. His kite experiment and other work in electricity
made him an international celebrity. He was the
first American to keep detailed, accurate daily
weather records and was among the first Americans
to make daily weather forecasts. His interest in
anatomy may even have led him to purchase cadavers
to dissect while he lived in England.)
He was a public servant, a politician, and one of
the founding fathers of our nation (Postmaster General
of Philadelphia, a member of the Second Continental
Congress who helped draft and signed the Declaration
of Independence, our ambassador to France, and a
delegate to the Constitutional Convention who signed
the Constitution).
He pursued women with notable success before, during,
and after his marriage. He fathered a son out of
wedlock before he was married, and he and his wife
raised the child along with two children of their
own.
In short, Ben Franklin lived life to the hilt in
so many directions that all we can do in making
a fair guess about the organizing adventure of his
life is to look at the choices he made when push
came to shove in his affairs.
Here
are some of the pertinent facts from the biographical
sources I cited above:
(1)
He ran away from home and from an apprenticeship
under his abusive brother to escape physical mistreatment.
(2)
He and Deborah spent 18 years of their 44-year marriage
apart. (Deborah refused to travel abroad.)
(3)
He invented a heat-efficient stove (the Franklin
stove) but refused to take out a patent on it because
he intended it purely as a public benefit.
(4)
He retired from printing in 1748, but engaged in
other businesses, in public affairs, and scientific
pursuits.
(5)
He lost his Crown appointment as Postmaster General
of Philadelphia in 1774 because of his highly vocal
support of independence for the colonies.
(6)
When he lost his Crown appointment, Franklin left
behind him "a legacy of postal roads stretching
from Maine to Florida, regular mail service between
the colonies and England, and a system for regulating
and auditing post offices." (Benjamin
Franklin: Man of Letters)
(7)
He incurred the wrath of the British Government
because he exposed the duplicity of the English
Governor of Massachusetts in dealing with the people
of that state.
From
these facts, we can reasonably infer that the love
adventure was not his Franklin's organizing adventure.
Neither was the pursuit of money or sex, although
he had a healthy interest in these activities. And
too much of his life was spent in public affairs
after he achieved significant economic success for
us to say that the pursuit of knowledge or of scientific
knowledge was the organizing adventure of his life.
What
we can say about him is that he saw social problems
and fixed them. But he functioned as so much more
than a politician that trying to think about his
life as organized around politics doesn't seem to
work, either. In fact, to see Franklin clearly,
we may have to move up a level: Ben Franklin lived
in a time that invited new ways of doing things
in all areas of life, and he pursued targets of
opportunity in every area of life that moved him
to action.
I
put it this way to myself in thinking about Ben
Franklin: He was a pure beneficent change-maker.
He saw so many opportunities to improve his own
life and the lives of others that he moved from
project to project in the direction that he saw
the greatest need for change to be. He was one of
the movers and shakers of his age and a prime facilitator
of change. He was fortunate in having the mental
equipment and other inner qualities that made this
kind of life possible for him.
In
the way of the usual organizing adventures of life,
these observations pretty much leave us with only
one choice:
We
have to say, or at least consider the possibility,
that the organizing adventure of Ben Franklin's
life was the marriage adventure.
The
marriage adventure is an adventure in which two
people commit themselves to become a single social,
economic, and psychological unit. They bind themselves
together to make the best life for themselves that
they can. They work together, and they share the
burdens and the benefits that come their way. It
is the most intimate of partnerships.
The
general expectation is that they will love each
other and limit their sex lives to each other and
they will probably have children and raise them.
When
this is the case, the marriage adventure is still
a different thing from these other adventures. The
love adventure, for example, may die a natural death
within the marriage adventure and still leave the
marriage adventure pretty much intact as a matter
of convenience or necessity. Two people whose marriage
adventure is the organizing adventure of their lives
may agree by mutual consent to live their sexual
adventures outside of marriage, and this may not
necessarily destroy the marriage. It could depend
on the people involved. And the adventure of having
and raising children may not even materialize within
a marriage without having any great effect on the
quality of the marriage. Again, it depends on the
people involved.
The
Franklins certainly fit the profile here. Indeed,
they were so successful in their partnership early
on in life that their resources gave Ben in particular
a base to work from in pursuing his other interests.
Indeed,
we almost have to say that Ben Franklin's later
life grew up from the base of his successful marriage
adventure. Or we might put the matter this way:
Ben Franklin's marriage adventure with Deborah
was so successful as the early organizing adventure
of his life that he was able to go on in his later
life to make a larger public adventure the organizing
adventure of his life. And he was able to do so
without abandoning his marriage adventure or even
undermining it in any substantial way.
And
so we might say that:
(1)
The organizing adventure for Ben Franklin, at least
in his later life, was the pursuit of changes to
improve the general quality of life in his society,
watershed changes that the nature of the times made
possible for the first time in human history.
Or
we could say that:
(2)
The organizing adventure for Ben Franklin, at least
in his later life, was the satisfaction of his curiosity
on a grand scale with a careful balance between
satisfying his own needs and promoting the general
good of his society. He seems always to have
been asking himself, "How does this work and
how can we make it work better?" "Why
can't we do things this other way instead of what
we do now?" And he had a happy knack for asking
questions about matters of consequence, as well
as generally coming up with answers.
I
rather like this way of thinking about Ben Franklin
in terms of successive organizing adventures.
But
it may well be fair to say that the organizing adventure
of his life was always something like one of these
last two ways of thinking about it and that his
successful marriage adventure was always a secondary
adventure. It was just the way he went about establishing
a base to work from.
In
any case, the range and substance of Ben Franklin's
contributions to our society suggest to me that
he may have been the greatest person of his age,
and simply saying that he created a successful organizing
adventure in his marriage doesn't quite seem to
do him justice.
My
Paternal Grandfather
One
of the most important things you can do with the concepts
at this Web site is to use them in "getting a handle
on" the members of your family.
The concepts can help to distance you just enough from your
relatives and from the intimate process of thinking about
them for you to see them with some clarity.
I
don't know how it is with you, but I seldom had relatives
say very much to me about themselves or other people in
the family when I was growing up. In my later years, though,
I did get some scattered stories and insights, and the information
cleared up some of the mysteries of my family for me.
Among
the things that were kept from me when I was young was information
about my father's father. He died when I was five, and I
remember crying at the news, not because he was dead and
that was a bad thing, but because I had picked up on the
fact that the rides in his big black Pontiac with the elongated
head of an Indian chief as a hood ornament were gone forever.
The car would not become my father's property. It would
be sold. (As is normal, I suppose, I was little more than
a bundle of childish egocentric needs and desires at the
age of five.)
Oddly
enough, I have no specific memory of being in that car,
and I have only one memory of my grandfather: I remember
him giving me a small glass of ginger ale, telling me to
drink it, and laughing at the face I must have made when
it burned my small tongue and my nostrils. I recall being
a bit on edge about the whole project at the time and of
feeling a bit embarrassed, irritated, and put upon. Even
though I rather liked the ginger ale, I didn't like being
laughed at.
That's
absolutely it for me when it comes to my memories
of the man.
But
over the years, I learned enough of the bare facts about
him to narrow down the organizing adventure of his life,
if not to work it out completely.
He
was an Englishman and an orphan when he first came to this
country. He was sixteen years old and making a trip with
a family party to visit various family members around the
world before entering into some kind of apprenticeship in
an office in London. The itinerary began in Philadelphia,
and the party intended to go through Texas, on to South
America, then to India, and finally back to England.
He
did not want to return to London and serve as an apprentice.
So, while the party was in Texas, as the story goes, he
was sitting along the road outside the home he was visiting,
feeling greatly irritated with his life and his family.
A muleskinner came by on his wagon and struck up a conversation
with him, and he simply rode off with the muleskinner.
I
don't know much about his first twenty years here (except
that he was married and divorced somewhere along the line
in that period), but at the age of 35 or so, he was a conductor
on the Cotton Belt Railroad and living in Pine Bluff, Arkansas.
I
have been given to understand that railroad conductors in
those early years were in charge of the train. They essentially
gave the orders as to what was to be done and how it was
to be done. They had pretty much the status in the public
mind that airline pilots have had in more recent times.
He
married my grandmother in the early part of the twentieth
century, when she was seventeen, and they did not live happily
ever after.
My
grandmother went into her marriage with significant cash
and real estate as her dowry, and in that time and place,
the woman's property became her husband's property upon
her marriage. She simply ceased to have any control over
the money matters in her life.
The
attitudes that my grandfather brought into his marriage
seem to have been pretty much the attitudes of the English
gentleman of the late nineteenth century. In particular,
he viewed my grandmother's money as his to do with as he
pleased, and with his income as a conductor to supplement
the pile of resources my grandmother brought into his life,
he lived very well.
He
spent my grandmother's money on liquor, automobiles, and
other women that he supported in the various places that
he traveled to in his work. He also reestablished contact
with his family in England and brought two very austere
maiden aunts to live with him and my grandmother. At least
one of them had allegedly been a seamstress to Queen Victoria,
and my grandmother (as she told me many years later) found
them very intimidating. (And indeed, even the pictures I
remember of them were very intimidating.)
He
was abusive in many ways, and he and my grandmother were
separated from time to time. They never divorced, though,
and he always came back.
In
the end, he timed his death perfectly. My grandmother was
left with no money and the real estate that was left was
mortgaged for as much as the banks would loan. All she had
were a wife's pension from the railroad and title to her
home, to one rental house, and to a few lots. The South
being the way it was, she also had her social status, which
was significant. (She was a DAR, UDC, Garden Club type and,
as I recall, served as state president of one or more these
organizations.) She supplemented her income after her husband's
death by giving piano lessons in her home and by selling
women's corsets and other undergarments. I am reasonably
certain that my parents also kicked in whatever they could
from time to time.
I
hesitate to say that she lived in poverty after her husband
died. I spent a lot of time in her home and never felt any
sense of deprivation, although I certainly never felt any
sense of luxury, either. Her refrigerator, for example,
was the oldest working piece of electrical machinery that
I have ever seen, and the stove that she cooked on was unique
in my memory in its antiquity. But both appliances did work,
and they worked very well. And I was always given to understand
that political and social access were mine for the asking,
which actually seemed to be the case a couple of times in
my life, even though I made the decision very early on that
I was not going to be a part of the Southern society scene.
I came over the years to think of my grandfather as a scoundrel.
But he was probably no worse than your average nineteenth-century
English gentleman adventurer type who "made a good
marriage." The money was there. It was essentially
his to spend, and he spent it. He probably expected his
sons to follow his example and marry money, too which
neither of them chose to do, probably in reaction to the
example that he set for them. My father, at least, had very
little use for his father and his father's ways.
My
grandfather had a good deal of charm and presence. He even
ran for mayor once, but lost. He died from a heart attack,
as I understand it, on the sidewalk outside of a bar on
Main Street. I also understand that his doctor had told
him that his next drink could kill him.
So,
what was the organizing adventure of his life?
My
best guess is that the marriage adventure was the organizing
adventure of his life but that his conception of
the marriage adventure was so different from my grandmother's
(and so different from the Franklin's conception in the
previous case) that the experience could not be a happy
one for either party.
My
grandfather was profoundly egocentric, and in his mind,
marriage was not a partnership in anything like the way
that most of us think of marriage as a partnership today.
But it may also be that his attitude towards marriage and
women was so strongly sanctioned in the England of his early
youth and in this country in the early twentieth century
that he saw absolutely nothing wrong with any of the abuse
that he inflicted on my grandmother. Her body, her property,
and indeed the world itself were his by right as the son
of an English gentleman. It was the duty of his sons to
follow his example and marry money. If they chose not to
do so, that was their problem.
On
the other hand, it may be that he saw life in terms of his
sex and money adventures, which included whatever he could
acquire in marriage. If this is the right perspective on
him, I can't really determine whether money or sex was the
organizing adventure of his life, but it could certainly
have been one or the other of them. The only other possibility
I can see has to do with preserving his self-image, and
that adventure is so dependent upon inner
realties that I have no idea how to give the concept any
substance here.
Love
was certainly not the organizing adventure of his life.
Neither was any form of business or public service, and
in spite of what may have been certain romantic notions
in the public mind of his age, I doubt that being a railroad
conductor actually had sufficient substance as a career
to be the organizing adventure of anyone's life. And there
is no indication at all in the remarks I have heard that
he was interested in maintaining the social position of
the family he married into. In his mind, I would guess that
he carried with him (in his perception of himself as an
English gentleman with consequential relatives) all of the
social prestige that he required.
Upon
reflection, I would classify his life as one of the saddest
stories I know because of its effects on his wife and children.
I suspect, though, that he saw things quite differently.
I would guess in fact that he found his life more than satisfactory,
even though I can't help but wonder if that's true.
|
Writing-to-Learn
Adventure #1:
The
Organizing Adventure of Life
Understand
Yourself and Other People and Make Your Love Life Work
Get
the Free PDF at
Lulu.
Writing-to-Learn
Adventure #2:
The
Worldview Layer of the Mind
The
Key to Surviving, Thriving, and Living the Good Life
(Coming Soon! Also Completely FREE
When It's Ready)
|
Dr.
Hilton's
Writing-to-Learn Adventures
"Have You Found the Organizing Adventure
for Your Life Yet?"
|
|